Sheehan, D. orcid.org/0000-0001-9605-0667 (2025) Third things, tracing and crypto-tokens. Law Quarterly Review, 141. 346--351. ISSN: 0023-933X
Abstract
Discusses case law on whether cryptocurrencies can be property in English law, commenting on D'Aloia v Persons Unknown (Ch D), concerning a cryptocurrency fraud. Considers the concepts of choses in possession and choses in action, "third things", and the tracing rules.
Metadata
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Authors/Creators: |
|
| Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | This item is protected by copyright. This is an author produced version of an article published in Law Quarterly Review. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. |
| Keywords: | Choses in action; Choses in possession; Constructive trusts; Cryptoassets; Cryptocurrencies; Fraud; Property; Proprietary rights; Tracing; Unknown persons |
| Dates: |
|
| Institution: | The University of Leeds |
| Academic Units: | The University of Leeds > Faculty of Education, Social Sciences and Law (Leeds) > School of Law (Leeds) |
| Date Deposited: | 14 Jan 2025 15:23 |
| Last Modified: | 15 Dec 2025 11:50 |
| Published Version: | https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IF6CF3110471E11F0B... |
| Status: | Published |
| Publisher: | Sweet and Maxwell |
| Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:221697 |
Download
Filename: D'Aloia Case Note LQR - Copy (1).pdf

CORE (COnnecting REpositories)
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)