Is inverse probability of censoring weighting a safer choice than per-protocol analysis in clinical trials?

Xuan, J. orcid.org/0000-0002-5721-4857, Mt-Isa, S., Latimer, N. orcid.org/0000-0001-5304-5585 et al. (5 more authors) (2025) Is inverse probability of censoring weighting a safer choice than per-protocol analysis in clinical trials? Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 34 (2). pp. 286-306. ISSN 0962-2802

Abstract

Metadata

Item Type: Article
Authors/Creators:
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information:

© 2024 The Authors. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Keywords: Inverse probability of censoring weight; dependent censoring; non-adherence; per-protocol; treatment switching
Dates:
  • Published: February 2025
  • Published (online): 12 December 2024
Institution: The University of Sheffield
Academic Units: The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health (Sheffield) > School of Medicine and Population Health
Funding Information:
Funder
Grant number
Yorkshire Cancer Research
S406NL
Depositing User: Symplectic Sheffield
Date Deposited: 17 Jan 2025 12:11
Last Modified: 10 Mar 2025 11:18
Status: Published
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Refereed: Yes
Identification Number: 10.1177/09622802241289559
Related URLs:
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID):

Export

Statistics