Krishna-Naik, V. orcid.org/0000-0002-8013-7554, Palmer, A., Hodson, N.A. et al. (2 more authors) (2024) Utilisation of a think-aloud protocol to validate a self-reported periodontitis questionnaire. Journal of Dentistry, 150. 105381. ISSN 0300-5712
Abstract
Objectives: The gold standard approach to diagnose periodontitis is based on clinical examination and radiographic investigations. This, however, is expensive, tedious, and not feasible in population-level assessments. The self-reported periodontitis questionnaire offers great benefit to facilitate larger epidemiological surveys. There is limited evidence on cognitive validation of self-reported periodontitis questionnaire. This study employed a think aloud approach to investigate if participants interpreted, comprehended, and understood the items in a self-reported periodontitis questionnaire, in the same way as researchers’ intended.
Methods: 20 adults, resident of the UK and fluent in English participated in online recorded think aloud interviews. The self-reported periodontitis questionnaire consists of 15 questions and 2 open ended questions. The interviews were then transcribed and coded by two independent researchers according to predefined categories representing comprehension and conventional content analysis was used to analyse open-ended data.
Results: The think aloud approach revealed that most of the questions in the self-reported periodontitis questionnaire were well understood by the participants. Two items, however, were identified as problematic: one was misinterpreted, and another question was not understood by most of the participants. Qualitative conventional content analysis of open-ended questions reiterated and complemented the findings of the think aloud study. Further questions coded as problematic for 3 or more participants were then considered for rephrasing.
Conclusions: This study revealed the interpretation and understanding of self-reported periodontitis questions by English speaking UK residents and highlighted the probable reason for lower sensitivity values of the self-reported periodontitis questionnaire.
Clinical significance: This study employed think-aloud approach to capture the thought process of the participants as they answered questions on self-reported periodontitis questionnaire. Overall, the questionnaire was well received by the participants, however, some questions were misunderstood/misinterpreted. This study highlights the potential information bias if participants do not understand the questions in epidemiological surveys.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © 2024 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Keywords: | cognitive test; diagnosis; periodontitis; qualitative research; self-reported; think aloud |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of Leeds |
Academic Units: | The University of Leeds > Faculty of Medicine and Health (Leeds) > School of Dentistry (Leeds) > Restorative Dentistry (Leeds) |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Publications |
Date Deposited: | 01 Oct 2024 14:11 |
Last Modified: | 18 Feb 2025 14:49 |
Status: | Published |
Publisher: | Elsevier |
Identification Number: | 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105381 |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:217775 |