Sullivan-Bissett, Ema and Noordhof, Paul orcid.org/0000-0001-5222-2439 (2024) Revisiting Maher’s One-Factor Theory of Delusion, Again. Neuroethics. 17. ISSN 1874-5504
Abstract
Chenwei Nie ([22]) argues against a Maherian one-factor approach to explaining delusion. We argue that his objections fail. They are largely based on a mistaken understanding of the approach (as committed to the claim that anomalous experience is sufficient for delusion). Where they are not so based, they instead rest on misinterpretation of recent defences of the position, and an underestimation of the resources available to the one-factor theory.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2024. |
Keywords: | anomalous experience,Delusion,one-factor,rationality,two-factor |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of York |
Academic Units: | The University of York > Faculty of Arts and Humanities (York) > Philosophy (York) |
Depositing User: | Pure (York) |
Date Deposited: | 18 Jul 2024 15:40 |
Last Modified: | 30 Oct 2024 01:08 |
Published Version: | https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-024-09553-6 |
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Identification Number: | 10.1007/s12152-024-09553-6 |
Related URLs: | |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:214953 |
Download
Filename: s12152-024-09553-6.pdf
Description: Revisiting Maher’s One-Factor Theory of Delusion, Again
Licence: CC-BY 2.5