Hutty, T., Hammond, J., Roberts, D. et al. (4 more authors) (2024) Lead-acid battolysers for hydrogen cooking: a comparison with electric cooking for sub-Saharan Africa. Energy for Sustainable Development, 81. 101491. ISSN 0973-0826
Abstract
A battolyser combines the function of battery and electrolyser in one device, i.e. it provides both electrical energy storage and a means to produce hydrogen. A battolyser with lead-acid chemistry has recently been proposed, and this has potential as a particularly low-cost solution. Here, the battolyser is considered for the production of hydrogen as a cooking fuel (“hCooking”) in sub-Saharan Africa, a region where cooking typically employs polluting fuels (firewood and charcoal). The more conventional approach for decarbonisation of cooking is the introduction of electric cookers (e.g. hotplate, induction hob, pressure cooker) which can be powered by PV and possibly battery storage; accordingly these electric cooking (“eCooking”) systems are considered as the competing decarbonised technology. Multi-objective optimisation is used to design both battolyser and eCooking systems for a notional off-grid community, with solar PV as the main energy source. Objectives are the minimisation of net present cost and lifetime greenhouse gas emissions, and Pareto frontiers are produced to show the play-off between these. Results show that a battolyser system could eliminate 95.6 % of CO2 emissions when compared with a baseline using charcoal, at an annualised cost of $507 per household, over a system lifetime of 20 years. However, eCooking systems appear superior to the battolyser, with the cleanest battery + eCook system achieving 95.8 % emissions reduction at annualised cost $422/household. More generally, hCooking systems are nearly always Pareto dominated by eCooking systems, even under a realistic range of sensitivity scenarios. This result is due to the inherently higher energy intensity of cooking over a flame compared to the eCooking options. Priorities to make the battolyser a more viable solution include extending its lifetime as far as possible, cheaper PV systems, and improved hydrogen burner efficiencies. We also show that eCooking together with some continued use of charcoal may be the cheapest possible cooking solution, whilst simultaneously curtailing 60 % of lifetime greenhouse gas emissions.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © 2024 The Authors. Except as otherwise noted, this author-accepted version of a journal article published in Energy for Sustainable Development is made available via the University of Sheffield Research Publications and Copyright Policy under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
Keywords: | Battolyser; Hydrogen cooking hCooking; Electric cooking eCooking; Sub-Saharan Africa; Solar PV |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of Sheffield |
Academic Units: | The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Engineering (Sheffield) > Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering (Sheffield) |
Funding Information: | Funder Grant number Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/L016818/1 |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Sheffield |
Date Deposited: | 17 Jun 2024 10:47 |
Last Modified: | 31 Jul 2024 12:13 |
Status: | Published |
Publisher: | Elsevier |
Refereed: | Yes |
Identification Number: | 10.1016/j.esd.2024.101491 |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:213378 |