Reviewing the Quality of Master’s Dissertations

This article reviews the quality of research done at the master's level at the National Academy of Governance, Mongolia. It explains the concepts of theories regarding the evaluation of research, and analyses master’s dissertations with the 16 criteria in seven categories. The overall analytical framework was based on the general criteria of credibility to define the quality of research, which was presented by Mårtensson et.al. (2016:597), as well as the questions to establish criteria that were used by Coughlan, Cronin, Ryan (2007:658) and CASP. The research result introduces subjects that research quality should focus upon to make better content, first and foremost being the internal accuracy of the research.