Daly, M.Y., Codina, C.J. and Arblaster, G.E. orcid.org/0000-0002-3656-3740 (2023) Is there value in measuring near visual acuity during occlusion therapy for amblyopia? Strabismus, 31 (4). pp. 237-243. ISSN 0927-3972
Abstract
Introduction: The purpose of this study was to investigate near and distance visual acuity (VA) prior to, during and on completion of occlusion therapy for amblyopia. Method: Fifty-four patients aged 4–7 years (mean 4.9; ±0.44) with untreated strabismic, anisometropic or mixed amblyopia were recruited to the study following refractive adaptation where applicable. All patients underwent conventional occlusion (patching). Uniocular near and distance VA was tested using age and ability appropriate Crowded LogMAR VA tests prior to, during and upon conclusion of occlusion therapy. Results: In amblyopic eyes, there was no significant difference between near and distance VA prior to occlusion therapy with LogMAR Crowded (p = .66; mean distance VA at 3 m = 0.6 LogMAR; mean near VA at 40 cm = 0.58 LogMAR), or with LogMAR Crowded Kay Picture test (p = .78, mean distance VA at 3 m = 0.44 LogMAR; mean near VA at 33 cm = 0.46 LogMAR;). No significant difference was found between near and distance VA at any visit during occlusion therapy, or on completion of occlusion therapy with LogMAR Crowded (p = .86, mean final distance VA at 3 m = 0.266 LogMAR; mean final near VA at 40 cm = 0.25 LogMAR) or LogMAR Crowded Kay Pictures (p = .74, mean final distance VA at 3 m = 0.16 LogMAR; mean final near VA at 33 cm = 0.16 LogMAR). There was no significant difference in the VA of the fellow (non-amblyopic) eyes prior to and on completion of occlusion therapy with LogMAR Crowded at distance (3 m) or near (40 cm) (p = .05, p = .40 respectively); or with LogMAR Crowded Kay Pictures at distance (3 m) or near (33 cm) (p = .89, p = .35 respectively). Discussion: Improvement in VA of amblyopic eyes did not significantly differ between near and distance testing proximites at any point during the course of occlusion therapy for amblyopia in our study. These findings may aid clinicians with appropriate test selection and help with clinical time pressures. Where patient concentration does not allow for uniocular distance vision, uniocular near vision may be used to diagnose amblyopia, and vice versa. This could prevent delay in the treatment of amblyopia.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © 2023 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. This is an author-produced version of a paper subsequently published in Strabismus. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. |
Keywords: | Distance visual acuity; near visual acuity; occlusion therapy |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of Sheffield |
Academic Units: | The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health (Sheffield) > Health Sciences School (Sheffield) |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Sheffield |
Date Deposited: | 03 Nov 2023 16:06 |
Last Modified: | 03 Nov 2024 01:13 |
Status: | Published |
Publisher: | Taylor and Francis Group |
Refereed: | Yes |
Identification Number: | 10.1080/09273972.2023.2271088 |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:204924 |