Yan, M., Martell, S., Dasog, M. et al. (2 more authors) (2023) Cost-competitive manufacture of porous-silicon anodes via the magnesiothermic reduction: a techno-economic analysis. Journal of Power Sources, 588. 233720. ISSN 0378-7753
Abstract
Lithium-ion batteries play a central role in the electrification of our energy systems however this technology still suffers from low energy density. Porous silicon (p-Si) has been recognised as a promising, high-energy density anode material as a replacement for the currently used graphite. The demand for p-Si is therefore expected to increase in the coming decades and the magnesiothermic reduction (MgTR) has shown great promise as a scalable process that can be used to meet this demand. However, without a preliminary or detailed economic analysis, it is not possible to determine whether this process is economically feasible at larger scales, under conditions that have thus been reported in the literature. Herein, as a first of a kind study, the total cost of production (TCOP) at scales between 300-1500kg/batch are calculated using experimentally verified data. Fixed costs make up the greatest proportion of TCOP, at 58% of the TCOP at the largest scale, with a payback time of 10 years. Total variable costs (feedstock and energy) was 42% of the TCOP. When recently reported modifications to MgTR – a two-step and ultra-low temperature methods – were considered, the variable costs reduced by ~40% and ~32% respectively, and reducing the TCOP for the two-step and low-temperature methods by 45% and 37% respectively. When the cost of producing p-Si through the MgTR process was compared to that of graphite on a “capacity cost” basis ($/Ah), it was clear that p-Si produced via MgTR process rivals the market price of graphite. These results provide the first evidence that the MgTR is a highly competitive and scalable process for producing anode grade porous silicon. The variable costs can be lowered in the future by changing the conditions, and the most effective ways to do this are presented in this study.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | Published version: © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CCBY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync-nd/4.0/). / Author Accepted Manuscript: © 2023 The Authors. Except as otherwise noted, this author-accepted version of a journal article published in Journal of Power Sources is made available via the University of Sheffield Research Publications and Copyright Policy under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of Sheffield |
Academic Units: | The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Engineering (Sheffield) > Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering (Sheffield) |
Funding Information: | Funder Grant number THE FARADAY INSTITUTION FIRG041 Natural Environment Research Council NE/V02129X/1 |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Sheffield |
Date Deposited: | 13 Oct 2023 14:27 |
Last Modified: | 23 Oct 2023 08:48 |
Status: | Published |
Publisher: | Elsevier |
Refereed: | Yes |
Identification Number: | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.233720 |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:204075 |
Downloads
Filename: POWER-D-23-02891 R2 highlighted.pdf
Licence: CC-BY 4.0
Filename: 1-s2.0-S0378775323010960-main.pdf
Licence: CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0