Sandro, P. orcid.org/0000-0002-0601-9031 (2023) Still Defending Moderate Cognitivism in Legal Interpretation: A Reply to Four, Excellent, Critics. Diritto and Questioni Pubbliche, 23 (1). pp. 55-72.
Abstract
In this reply, I address many of the comments raise by the four commentators of this symposium on my book The Making of Constitutional Democracy: From Creation to Application of Law. In particular, I defend the moderate cognitivism in legal interpretation developed in the book from the sharp critiques by each of the authors of the comments.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Keywords: | constitutional democracy, moderate cognitivism, legal realism, semantic minimalism, contextualism |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of Leeds |
Academic Units: | The University of Leeds > Faculty of Education, Social Sciences and Law (Leeds) > School of Law (Leeds) |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Publications |
Date Deposited: | 08 Nov 2023 13:08 |
Last Modified: | 08 Nov 2023 13:08 |
Published Version: | http://www.dirittoequestionipubbliche.org/page/202... |
Status: | Published |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:202653 |
Download not available
A full text copy of this item is not currently available from White Rose Research Online