Risk-of-bias assessment using RoB2 was useful but challenging and resource-intensive: observations from a systematic review.

Crocker, T orcid.org/0000-0001-7450-3143, Lam, N orcid.org/0000-0001-8591-444X, Jordão, M orcid.org/0000-0003-2108-2677 et al. (6 more authors) (2023) Risk-of-bias assessment using RoB2 was useful but challenging and resource-intensive: observations from a systematic review. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 161. pp. 39-45. ISSN 0895-4356

Abstract

Metadata

Item Type: Article
Authors/Creators:
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information:

© 2023, Elsevier. This is an author produced version of an article published in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativeco mmons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Keywords: RoB2; risk of bias; process duration; research methods; certainty assessment; systematic reviews
Dates:
  • Published: September 2023
  • Published (online): 24 June 2023
  • Accepted: 20 June 2023
Institution: The University of Leeds
Academic Units: The University of Leeds > Faculty of Medicine and Health (Leeds) > School of Medicine (Leeds) > Leeds Institute of Health Sciences (Leeds) > Academic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation (Leeds)
Funding Information:
Funder
Grant number
NIHR National Inst Health Research
NIHR128862
Depositing User: Symplectic Publications
Date Deposited: 03 Jul 2023 15:23
Last Modified: 23 Jan 2025 12:14
Published Version: https://www.jclinepi.com/article/S0895-4356(23)001...
Status: Published
Publisher: Elsevier
Identification Number: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.06.015
Related URLs:
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID):

Export

Statistics