This is the latest version of this eprint.
Jones, B. orcid.org/0000-0003-2344-976X (2023) Surprisingly (un)inspiring judicial decisions. University of Illinois Law Review. ISSN 0276-9948
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © 2022 By The Board of Trustees Of the University of Illinois. This is an author-produced version of a paper subsequently published in University of Illinois Law Review. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of Sheffield |
Academic Units: | The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Social Sciences (Sheffield) > School of Law (Sheffield) |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Sheffield |
Date Deposited: | 16 Feb 2023 14:55 |
Last Modified: | 16 Feb 2023 14:55 |
Published Version: | https://illinoislawreview.org/online/surprisingly-... |
Status: | Published online |
Publisher: | University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Law |
Refereed: | Yes |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:196471 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Surprisingly (un)inspiring judicial decisions: Lochner, Brown, Roe and others. (deposited 02 Nov 2022 18:35)
- Surprisingly (un)inspiring judicial decisions. (deposited 16 Feb 2023 14:55) [Currently Displayed]