Stern, R. orcid.org/0000-0003-2967-647X (2022) Murdoch and K. E. Løgstrup. In: Panizza, S.C. and Hopwood, M., (eds.) The Murdochian Mind. Routledge , Abingdon , pp. 331-344. ISBN 9780367468019
Abstract
This chapter considers the relation between Iris Murdoch’s position and that of the Danish philosopher and theologian K. E. Løgstrup. While neither knew of each other’s work, there are interesting points of comparison, both positively, but also negatively. On the positive side, for example, they have similar views on love and its obstacles, the significance of art, the need for social norms, and the barrenness of much analytic philosophy. But on the negative side, they have an important disagreement on the question of whether we can ‘make ourselves morally better’, as Murdoch puts it. On this issue, Løgstrup is much more pessimistic than Murdoch, which would lead him to be sceptical regarding her claims regarding the effectiveness of her ‘techniques of unselfing’, for reasons that are discussed and evaluated.
Metadata
Item Type: | Book Section |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Editors: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © 2022 The Author. This is an author-produced version of a chapter subsequently published in The Murdochian Mind. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of Sheffield |
Academic Units: | The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Arts and Humanities (Sheffield) > Department of Philosophy (Sheffield) |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Sheffield |
Date Deposited: | 07 Jul 2022 10:57 |
Last Modified: | 03 Dec 2023 01:13 |
Published Version: | https://www.routledge.com/The-Murdochian-Mind/Pani... |
Status: | Published |
Publisher: | Routledge |
Refereed: | Yes |
Identification Number: | 10.4324/9781003031222-28 |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:188650 |