Selective cutoff reporting in studies of the accuracy of the Patient Health Questionnaire‐9 and Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale: comparison of results based on published cutoffs versus all cutoffs using individual participant data meta‐analysis

Neupane, D., Levis, B., Bhandari, P.M. et al. (3 more authors) (2021) Selective cutoff reporting in studies of the accuracy of the Patient Health Questionnaire‐9 and Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale: comparison of results based on published cutoffs versus all cutoffs using individual participant data meta‐analysis. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 30 (3). e1873. ISSN 1049-8931

Abstract

Metadata

Item Type: Article
Authors/Creators:
  • Neupane, D.
  • Levis, B.
  • Bhandari, P.M.
  • Thombs, B.D.
  • Benedetti, A.
  • DEPRESsion Screening Data (DEPRESSD) Collaboration
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information:

© 2021 The Authors. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

Keywords: diagnostic test accuracy; individual participant data meta-analysis; meta-analysis; publication bias; selective cutoff reporting
Dates:
  • Published: September 2021
  • Published (online): 12 May 2021
  • Accepted: 1 April 2021
Institution: The University of Sheffield
Academic Units: The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Science (Sheffield) > Department of Psychology (Sheffield)
Depositing User: Symplectic Sheffield
Date Deposited: 13 Dec 2021 14:52
Last Modified: 13 Dec 2021 15:01
Status: Published
Publisher: Wiley
Refereed: Yes
Identification Number: 10.1002/mpr.1873
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID):

Export

Statistics