Frempong, SN orcid.org/0000-0002-3042-7393, King, N orcid.org/0000-0002-4215-2323 and Sagoo, GS orcid.org/0000-0003-1427-1437 (2022) The cost-effectiveness of using rapid diagnostic tests for the diagnosis of typhoid fever in patients with suspected typhoid fever: a systematic review. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 22 (3). pp. 391-397. ISSN 1473-7167
Abstract
Introduction
Despite the availability of several commercial rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) developed to detect typhoid fever, the cost-effectiveness in resource-limited settings is unclear. This review aimed to explore the literature on typhoid economic evaluations in order to assess the cost-effectiveness of using typhoid RDTs in resource-limited settings.
Areas covered
A systematic review was conducted focusing on the identification of economic evaluations of typhoid RDTs to diagnose patients with suspected typhoid fever. Two studies were identified and included for narrative synthesis. Whilst highlighting a gap in the published literature, this review shows the use of typhoid RDTs to potentially be cost-effective in resource limited settings. Factors that appeared as significant in determining cost-effectiveness related to test characteristics (such as sensitivity, specificity and cost) and the prevalence of typhoid fever and should factor into any future evaluations.
Expert opinion
Concerted effort is needed in resource-limited settings with regards to medical device regulation to ensure that clinically effective and cost-effective typhoid RDTs are widely available and introduced into clinical practice. Typhoid modelling (with respect to typhoid testing and treatment strategies) represents an understudied area and further work is needed.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. |
Keywords: | Systematic review; cost–benefit analysis; cost–utility analysis; cost-effectiveness analysis; economic evaluation; enteric fever; typhoid fever; rapid diagnostic tests |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of Leeds |
Academic Units: | The University of Leeds > Faculty of Medicine and Health (Leeds) > School of Medicine (Leeds) > Leeds Institute of Health Sciences (Leeds) > Academic Unit of Health Economics (Leeds) |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Publications |
Date Deposited: | 09 Dec 2021 15:26 |
Last Modified: | 27 Nov 2022 01:13 |
Status: | Published |
Publisher: | Taylor & Francis |
Identification Number: | 10.1080/14737167.2022.2012453 |
Related URLs: | |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:181414 |
Downloads
Filename: rManuscript.pdf
Filename: 14737167.2022.pdf
Licence: CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0