
There is a more recent version of this eprint available. Click here to view it.
Greenhalgh, T, Katzourakis, A, Wyatt, TD et al. (1 more author) (2021) Rapid evidence review to inform safe return to campus in the context of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Wellcome Open Research, 6. 282. ISSN 2398-502X
Abstract
Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is transmitted predominantly through the air in crowded and unventilated indoor spaces among unvaccinated people. Universities and colleges are potential settings for its spread.
Methods: An interdisciplinary team from public health, virology, and biology used narrative methods to summarise and synthesise evidence on key control measures, taking account of mode of transmission.
Results: Evidence from a wide range of primary studies supports six measures. Vaccinate (aim for > 90% coverage and make it easy to get a jab). Require masks indoors, especially in crowded settings. If everyone wears well-fitting cloth masks, source control will be high, but for maximum self-protection, respirator masks should be worn. Masks should not be removed for speaking or singing. Space people out by physical distancing (but there is no “safe” distance because transmission risk varies with factors such as ventilation, activity levels and crowding), reducing class size (including offering blended learning), and cohorting (students remain in small groups with no cross-mixing). Clean indoor air using engineering controls—ventilation (while monitoring CO2 levels), inbuilt filtration systems, or portable air cleaners fitted with high efficiency particulate air [HEPA] filters). Test asymptomatic staff and students using lateral flow tests, with tracing and isolating infectious cases when incidence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is high. Support clinically vulnerable people to work remotely. There is no direct evidence to support hand sanitising, fomite controls or temperature-taking. There is evidence that freestanding plastic screens, face visors and electronic air-cleaning systems are ineffective.
Conclusions: The above six evidence-based measures should be combined into a multi-faceted strategy to maximise both student safety and the continuation of in-person and online education provision. Staff and students seeking to negotiate a safe working and learning environment should collect data (e.g. CO2 levels, room occupancy) to inform conversations.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © 2021 Greenhalgh T et al. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) |
Keywords: | SARS-CoV-2, aerosol transmission, hierarchy of controls, higher education policy, infection prevention and control |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of Leeds |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Publications |
Date Deposited: | 18 Nov 2021 15:04 |
Last Modified: | 25 Jun 2023 22:48 |
Status: | Published online |
Publisher: | F1000 Research |
Identification Number: | 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17270.1 |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:180033 |
Available Versions of this Item
- Rapid evidence review to inform safe return to campus in the context of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). (deposited 18 Nov 2021 15:04) [Currently Displayed]
Download
Filename: b45bbf72-a09a-4bfb-9558-07fedc6478c0_17270_-_trish_greenhalgh.pdf
Licence: CC-BY 4.0