Sagar, R, Lenti, MV, Clark, T et al. (7 more authors) (2021) Infliximab Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Virtual Biologics Clinic Leads to Durable Clinical Results. Inflammatory Intestinal Diseases, 6 (3). pp. 132-139. ISSN 2296-9403
Abstract
Background: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of infliximab (IFX) trough levels and anti-drug antibodies in conjunction with symptoms, disease history, and investigations can aid decision-making. This study evaluated 1-year outcomes of patients with decisions that were altered on the basis of TDM results, in order to investigate whether outcomes from TDM-based decisions to adjust or stop IFX treatment are durable. Methods: We retrospectively collected clinical outcomes 12 months post treatment decisions based on proactive TDM. Patients whose initial treatment decisions were altered on the basis of TDM results were compared with those where the decision remained unchanged. Events of interest were inpatient admissions with active inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), further changes to biologic therapy, and IBD-related health-care costs. Results: Of 189 patients, 54 (28%) had initial treatment decisions altered in the light of TDM results. The 135 patients whose initial decision was not altered in light of TDM results served as the comparator. There were no differences in hospitalization rates or subsequent biologic switches between the altered decision groups and the comparator group. IBD-related health-care costs were higher in those whose initial decision was altered (median GBP 7,912 vs. GBP 6,521; p < 0.0001) due to higher drug costs (median GBP 7,062 vs. GBP 6,012; p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Our study demonstrates good outcomes from changes to IFX treatment based on TDM. Patients with a decision to stop, switch, or continue with an adjusted IFX dose experienced comparable clinical outcomes but had higher drug-related expenditure than those whose treatment decision was not altered in light of TDM.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © 2021 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes requires written permission. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements. |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of Leeds |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Publications |
Date Deposited: | 21 Oct 2021 15:59 |
Last Modified: | 21 Oct 2021 15:59 |
Status: | Published |
Publisher: | Karger Publishers |
Identification Number: | 10.1159/000515593 |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:179332 |