Rotherham, I.D. and Flinders, M. orcid.org/0000-0003-3585-9010 (2019) No stump city : the contestation and politics of urban street-trees – a case study of Sheffield. People, Place and Policy, 12 (3). pp. 188-203. ISSN 1753-8041
Abstract
Issues of sustainable development, liveable cities, green infrastructure, and urban ecosystem services currently receive attention from researchers and decision-makers. Furthermore, the benefits to public wellbeing and health of high quality open spaces and green areas are now undisputed (e.g. Simson, 2008; Booth, 2005, 2006). However, with increasing pressure on urban landscapes for competing uses like housing-development green-spaces are under threat. Furthermore, austerity-driven cuts to local authority budgets mean loss of core services and skills relating to open-space management and planning. Some local authorities such as Newcastle City Council are withdrawing all expenditure on parks and community spaces. With major challenges in providing good quality urban green-spaces, the loss of most local authority countryside management services from 2008 onwards, reflects bigger problems (see Rotherham, 2014, 2015 for example).
Within this wider scenario has been the growing importance of Public Private Partnerships (PPP) to deliver core environmental and green-space services in many urban areas. These have been seen as possible fixes for the current waves of austerity cuts and many local authorities such as Sheffield City Council have gone down this route. Nevertheless, real costs (financial and otherwise) of Private Finance Initiatives (PFIs) are now emerging (Syal, 2018). There are also issues of public access to information once contracts become ‘commercially sensitive’ and of profit-driven delivery of core ‘public benefit’ services. These changes threaten ‘local environmental democracy’ as part of a wider shift in democratic processes (Flinders, 2012, 2017).
This paper examines wider issues of austerity-driven cuts to green-space services, of PFI projects, and of local environmental democracy. It takes the Sheffield street-trees initiative as an exemplar case-study to interrogate the broad concerns.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © 2019 The Author(s). This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0). |
Keywords: | governance; street trees; Sheffield; urban forestry; environmental democracy |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of Sheffield |
Academic Units: | The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Social Sciences (Sheffield) > Department of Politics and International Relations (Sheffield) |
Funding Information: | Funder Grant number The Leverhulme Trust ECF/2009/0224 Economic and Social Research Council ES/N006216/1; ES/N00874X/1 Arts and Humanities Research Council AH/L014696/1 |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Sheffield |
Date Deposited: | 30 Nov 2020 09:17 |
Last Modified: | 30 Nov 2020 09:17 |
Status: | Published |
Publisher: | Sheffield Hallam University |
Refereed: | Yes |
Identification Number: | 10.3351/ppp.2019.8283649746 |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:168525 |