Kennedy, F orcid.org/0000-0002-4910-2505, Absolom, K orcid.org/0000-0002-5477-6643, Clayton, B et al. (6 more authors) (2020) Electronic Patient Reporting of Adverse Events and Quality of Life: A Prospective Feasibility Study in General Oncology. JCO Oncology Practice, 17 (3). e386-e396. ISSN 2688-1527
Abstract
PURPOSE:
Adverse event (AE) reporting is essential in clinical trials. Clinician interpretation can result in under-reporting; therefore, the value of patient self-reporting has been recognized. The National Cancer Institute has developed a Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) for direct patient AE reporting. A nonrandomized prospective cohort feasibility study aimed to explore the compliance and acceptability of an electronic (Internet or telephone) system for collecting patient self-reported AEs and quality of life (QOL).
METHODS:
Oncology patients undergoing treatment (chemotherapy, targeted agents, hormone therapy, radiotherapy, and/or surgery) at 2 hospitals were sent automated weekly reminders to complete PRO-CTCAE once a week and QOL (for a maximum of 12 weeks). Patients had to speak/understand English and have access to the Internet or a touch-tone telephone. Primary outcome was compliance (proportion of expected questionnaires), and recruitment rate, attrition, and patient/staff feedback were also explored.
RESULTS:
Of 520 patients, 249 consented (47.9%)—mean age was 62 years, 51% were male, and 70% were married—and 230 remained on the study at week 12. PRO-CTCAE was completed at 2,301 (74.9%) of 3,074 timepoints and QOL at 749 (79.1%) of 947 timepoints. Individual weekly/once every 4 weeks compliance reduced over time but was more than 60% throughout. Of 230 patients, 106 (46.1%) completed 13 or more PRO-CTCAE, and 136 (59.1%) of 230 patients completed 4 QOL questionnaires. Most were completed on the Internet (82.3%; mean age, 60.8 years), which was quicker, but older patients preferred the telephone option (mean age, 70.0 years). Positive feedback was received from patients and staff.
CONCLUSION:
Self-reporting of AEs and QOL using an electronic home-based system is feasible and acceptable. Implementation of this approach in cancer clinical trials may improve the precision and accuracy of AE reporting.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © 2020 by American Society of Clinical Oncology. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of Leeds |
Funding Information: | Funder Grant number Cancer Research UK C7775/A14384 NIHR National Inst Health Research RP-PG-0611-20008 |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Publications |
Date Deposited: | 17 Jul 2020 09:37 |
Last Modified: | 25 Jun 2023 22:21 |
Status: | Published online |
Publisher: | American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) |
Identification Number: | 10.1200/op.20.00118 |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:163305 |