Holroyd, J. (2020) Implicit bias and epistemic vice. In: Kidd, I.J., Battaly, H. and Cassam, Q., (eds.) Vice Epistemology. Routledge ISBN 9781138504431
Abstract
This chapter starts by sketching the contours of implicit biases, and then turns to the recent claim, from Cassam, that implicit biases are epistemic vices. Implicit biases are heterogeneous phenomena. Authors tend to point to various features that implicit biases share: they operate quickly and automatically, they may be difficult for the agent to control or be aware of, they may be arational or limited in the extent to which they are guided by the norms that govern other mental states. Cassam is also explicit that cognitive biases, including implicit biases, may also be candidates for epistemic vice. Drawing on the idea that implicit biases are ‘habits of thought’ Cassam argues that implicit biases can be understood as epistemically harmful attitudes. Implicit biases in an individual’s mental economy don’t appear to produce the relevant (bad) consequences with the required systematicity to establish them as epistemic vices.
Metadata
Item Type: | Book Section |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Editors: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © 2020 The Author. This is an author-produced version of a paper subsequently published in Vice Epistemology. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of Sheffield |
Academic Units: | The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Arts and Humanities (Sheffield) > Department of Philosophy (Sheffield) |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Sheffield |
Date Deposited: | 23 Apr 2020 13:52 |
Last Modified: | 15 Apr 2022 00:38 |
Published Version: | https://www.routledge.com/Vice-Epistemology-1st-Ed... |
Status: | Published |
Publisher: | Routledge |
Refereed: | Yes |
Identification Number: | 10.4324/9781315146058-10 |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:159806 |