Kirkham, R. and O'Loughlin, E.A. (2020) Judicial review and ombuds: a systematic analysis. Public Law, 2020 (Oct). pp. 680-700. ISSN 0033-3565
Abstract
Presents a study of the courts' approach to reviewing the decisions of ombudsmen. Examines key features of the parties' relationship, the applicable principles of administrative law, the methodology of the survey, and its main findings on issues such as the role of statutory interpretation and the use of judicial creativity. Details the grounds on which decisions may be quashed, the uses of precedent, and the main lessons of the study.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © 2020 Sweet and Maxwell. This is an author-produced version of a paper subsequently published in Public Law. This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial Licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. You may not use the material for commercial purposes. |
Keywords: | Courts' powers and duties; Judicial review; Ombudsmen; Statutory interpretation |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of Sheffield |
Academic Units: | The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Social Sciences (Sheffield) > School of Law (Sheffield) |
Funding Information: | Funder Grant number Nuffield Foundation LAW/42770 |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Sheffield |
Date Deposited: | 10 Mar 2020 09:02 |
Last Modified: | 01 Oct 2021 00:38 |
Published Version: | http://www.sweetandmaxwell.co.uk/Catalogue/Product... |
Status: | Published |
Publisher: | Sweet and Maxwell |
Refereed: | Yes |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:158243 |
Download
Filename: Judicial Review and Ombuds - REVISED RESUMBISSION.pdf
Licence: CC-BY-NC 4.0