Akram, M., Milkowski, K., Gibbins, J. et al. (1 more author) (2020) Comparative energy and environmental performance of 40% and 30% monoethanolamine at PACT pilot plant. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 95. 102946. ISSN 1750-5836
Abstract
Post combustion CO2 capture using amines is one of the most well understood processes. The most widely used and studied solvent for this purpose is 30% Monoethanolamine (MEA). The main issue with the process is the use of energy for stripping CO2 out of the solvent. It is anticipated that higher concentrations of MEA can capture a higher amount of CO2 and thus reduce energy consumption but may also result in a worsening of the environmental emissions due to potential increase in corrosion and solvent degradation.
In order to study the impact of 40% MEA (as opposed to 30% MEA) on the capture plant performance, a test campaign was carried out at the Pilot Scale Advanced Capture Technology (PACT) facilities of the UK Carbon Capture and Storage Research Centre (UKCCSRC) using 30% and 40% MEA. The absorber (9 m height x 0.3 m dia.) is packed with 28 sections (6.5 m) of Mellapak CC3 structured packing. The absorption column temperature profile is measured by 10 RTDs installed around 48 cm apart along the column length. The performance of the capture plant in terms of reboiler duty, capture efficiency, loading capacity and liquid to gas ratio is evaluated at different operating conditions.
It has been found that specific reboiler duty using 40% MEA drops by up to 14% as compared to that with 30% MEA under similar test conditions. It has also been observed that the process is very sensitive to reboiler temperature and slight changes in reboiler temperature can have a significant impact on the plant performance. Moreover, similar energy and capture performance can be achieved at different reboiler temperatures with right combination of temperature and pressure in the reboiler/stripper. Corrosion rate was found to be higher with 40% MEA than 30% MEA. Solvent degradation rate and solvent carry over has also indicated slightly higher levels for 40%. Water wash was shown to be effective in recovering most of the MEA from the flue gas.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. This is an author produced version of a paper subsequently published in International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. Article available under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-ND licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
Keywords: | Monoethanolamine; Next generation solvents; Carbon capture; Solvent degradation |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of Sheffield |
Academic Units: | The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Engineering (Sheffield) > Department of Mechanical Engineering (Sheffield) |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Sheffield |
Date Deposited: | 15 Jan 2020 15:31 |
Last Modified: | 12 Feb 2021 01:38 |
Status: | Published |
Publisher: | Elsevier |
Refereed: | Yes |
Identification Number: | 10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.102946 |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:155639 |
Download
Filename: Comparative Performance of 40% and 30% MEA.pdf
Licence: CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0