Martland, ME, Rashidi, AS, Bennett, MI orcid.org/0000-0002-8369-8349 et al. (4 more authors) (2020) The use of quantitative sensory testing in cancer pain assessment: A systematic review. European Journal of Pain, 24 (4). pp. 669-684. ISSN 1090-3801
Abstract
Objective: To summarize the literature on the use of quantitative sensory testing (QST) in the assessment of pain in people with cancer and to describe which QST parameters consistently demonstrate abnormal sensory processing in patients with cancer pain.
Databases and Data Treatment: Medline, EMBASE, AMED, CINAHL, SCOPUS and CENTRAL were searched for observational or experimental studies using QST in patients with a cancer diagnosis and reporting pain. Search strategies were based on the terms “quantitative sensory testing”, “cancer”, “pain”, “cancer pain” and “assessment”. Databases were searched from inception to January 2019. Data were extracted and synthesized narratively, structured around the different QST modalities and sub‐grouped by cancer pain aetiology (tumour‐ or treatment‐related pain).
Results: Searches identified 286 records of which 18 met the eligibility criteria for inclusion. Three studies included patients with tumour‐related pain, and 15 studies included patients with pain from chemotherapy‐induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). Across all studies, 50% (9/18) reported sensory abnormities using thermal detection thresholds (cool and warm), 44% (8/18) reported abnormal mechanical detection thresholds using von‐Frey filaments and 39% (7/18) found abnormal pinprick thresholds. Abnormal vibration and thermal pain (heat/cold) thresholds were each reported in a third of included studies.
Conclusion: This systematic review highlights the lack of published data characterizing the sensory phenotype of tumour‐related cancer pain. This has implications for our understanding of the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of cancer pain. Understanding the multiple mechanisms driving cancer pain will help to move towards rational individualized analgesic treatment choices.
Significance: This systematic review found that pain in cancer patients is associated with abnormal sensory responses to thermal, mechanical and pinprick stimuli. However, these findings are based primarily on studies of chemotherapy‐induced peripheral neuropathy and data on tumour‐related pain are lacking, warranting further research.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © 2019 European Pain Federation ‐ EFIC®. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Martland, ME, Rashidi, AS, Bennett, MI, et al. The use of quantitative sensory testing in cancer pain assessment: A systematic review. Eur J Pain. 2020; 24: 669– 684. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1520, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1520. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. |
Keywords: | Assessment; Cancer; Pain; QST; Quantitative Sensory Testing; Systematic Review |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of Leeds |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Publications |
Date Deposited: | 17 Dec 2019 11:52 |
Last Modified: | 10 Dec 2020 01:39 |
Status: | Published |
Publisher: | Wiley |
Identification Number: | 10.1002/ejp.1520 |
Related URLs: | |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:154689 |