Booth, A, Briscoe, S and Wright, JM orcid.org/0000-0002-5239-0173 (2020) The “realist search”: A systematic scoping review of current practice and reporting. Research Synthesis Methods, 11 (1). pp. 14-35. ISSN 1759-2879
Abstract
The requirement for literature searches that identify studies for inclusion in systematic reviews should be systematic, explicit, and reproducible extends, at least by implication, to other types of literature review. However, realist reviews commonly require literature searches that challenge systematic reporting; searches are iterative and involve multiple search strategies and approaches. Notwithstanding these challenges, reporting of the “realist search” can be structured to be transparent and to facilitate identification of innovative retrieval practices. Our six‐component search framework consolidates and extends the structure advanced by Pawson, one of the originators of realist review: formulating the question, conducting the background search, searching for program theory, searching for empirical studies, searching to refine program theory and identifying relevant mid‐range theory, and documenting and reporting the search process. This study reviews reports of search methods in 34 realist reviews published within the calendar year of 2016. Data from all eligible reviews were extracted from the search framework. Realist search reports poorly differentiate between the different search components. Review teams often conduct a single “big bang” multipurpose search to fulfill multiple functions within the review. However, it is acknowledged that realist searches are likely to be iterative and responsive to emergent data. Overall, the search for empirical studies appears most comprehensive in conduct and reporting detail. In contrast, searches to identify and refine program theory are poorly conducted, if at all, and poorly reported. Use of this framework offers greater transparency in conduct and reporting while preserving flexibility and methodological innovation.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Booth, A, Briscoe, S, Wright, JM. The “realist search”: A systematic scoping review of current practice and reporting. Res Syn Meth. 2020; 11: 14– 35. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1386 , which has been published in final form at https://doi.org//10.1002/jrsm.1386. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. |
Keywords: | Realist synthesis; literature searches; reporting standards |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of Leeds |
Academic Units: | The University of Leeds > Faculty of Medicine and Health (Leeds) > School of Medicine (Leeds) > Leeds Institute of Health Sciences (Leeds) > Academic Unit of Health Economics (Leeds) |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Publications |
Date Deposited: | 19 Nov 2019 12:38 |
Last Modified: | 12 Nov 2020 01:39 |
Status: | Published |
Publisher: | Wiley |
Identification Number: | 10.1002/jrsm.1386 |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:153526 |