Comparison of Major Depression Diagnostic Classification Probability using the SCID, CIDI and MINI Diagnostic Interviews among Women in Pregnancy or Postpartum:An Individual Participant Data Meta-analysis

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: A previous individual participant data meta-analysis (IPDMA) identified differences in major depression classification rates between different diagnostic interviews, controlling for depressive symptoms on the basis of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. We aimed to determine whether similar results would be seen in a different population, using studies that administered the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) in pregnancy or postpartum. METHODS: Data accrued for an EPDS diagnostic accuracy IPDMA were analysed. Binomial generalised linear mixed models were fit to compare depression classification odds for the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), and Structured Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID), controlling for EPDS scores and participant characteristics. RESULTS: Among fully structured interviews, the MINI (15 studies, 2,532 participants, 342 major depression cases) classified depression more often than the CIDI (3 studies, 2,948 participants, 194 major depression cases; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.21, 11.43]). Compared with the semistructured SCID (28 studies, 7,403 participants, 1,027 major depression cases), odds with the CIDI (interaction aOR = 0.88, 95% CI [0.85, 0.92]) and MINI (interaction aOR = 0.95, 95% CI [0.92, 0.99]) increased less as EPDS scores increased. CONCLUSION: Different interviews may not classify major depression equivalently.

Metadata

Item Type:	Article
Authors/Creators:	Levis, Brooke McMillan, Dean https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2901-8410 Sun, Ying He, Chen Rice, Danielle B Krishnan, Ankur Wu, Yin Azar, Marleine Sanchez, Tatiana A Chiovitti, Matthew J Bhandari, Parash Mani Neupane, Dipika Saadat, Nazanin Riehm, Kira E Imran, Mahrukh Boruff, Jill T. Cuijpers, Pim Gilbody, Simon https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8236-6983 Ioannidis, John P A Kloda, Lorie A Patten, Scott B Shrier, Ian Ziegelstein, Roy C Comeau, Liane Mitchell, Nicholas Tonelli, Marcello Vigod, Simone N. Aceti, Franca Alvarado, Rubén Alvarado-Esquivel, Cosme Bakare, Muideen O. Barnes, Jacqueline Tatano Beck, Cheryl Bindt, Carola Boyce, Philip M. Bunevicius, Adomas Castro e Couto, Tiago Chaudron, Linda H. Correa, Humberto Pinheiro de Figueiredo, Felipe Eapen, Valsamma ., Michelle Fernandes ., Bárbara F. C. Figueiredo .Fisher, Jane R. W. ., Lluïsa Garcia-Esteve ., Lisa Giardinelli ., Nadine Helle ., Louise M. Howard ., Dina Sami Khalifa ., Laima Kusminskas ., Jane Kohlhoff ., Zoltán Kozinszky Lelli, Lorenzo Leonardou, Angeliki A. Lewis, Beth A. Maes, Michael Meuti, Valentina Nakić Radoš, Sandra Navarro García, Purificación Nishi, Daisuke Okitundu Luwa E-Andjafono, Daniel Robertson-Blackmore, Emma Rochat, Tamsen J. Rowe, Heather J. Siu, Bonnie W. M. Skalkidou, Alkistis Stein, Alan Stewart, Robert C. Su, Kuan-Pin Sundström-Poromaa, Inger Tadinac, Meri Darius Tandon, s Tendais, Iva Thiagayson, Pavaani Töreki, Annamária Torres-Giménez, Anna Tran, Thach D. Trevillion, Kylee Turner, Katherine Vega-Dienstmaier, Johann M. Wynter, Karen Yonkers, Kimberly A. Benedetti, Andrea Thombs, Brett D
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information:	© 2019 The Authors.
Dates:	Published (online): 30 September 2019 Accepted: 16 August 2019
Institution:	The University of York
Academic Units:	The University of York > Faculty of Sciences (York) > Hull York Medical School (York)
Depositing User:	Pure (York)
Date Deposited:	22 Aug 2019 09:30
Last Modified:	16 Oct 2024 15:57
Status:	Published online
Refereed:	Yes
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID):	oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:149968

Download

Published Version

Filename: Levis_et_al_2019_International_Journal_of_Methods_in_Psychiatric_Research.pdf

Description: Levis_et_al-2019-International_Journal_of_Methods_in_Psychiatric_Research

Licence: CC-BY 2.5

CLICK TO DOWNLOAD

[thumbnail of Levis_et_al-2019-International_Journal_of_Methods_in_Psychiatric_Research]

CORE (COnnecting REpositories)

Comparison of Major Depression Diagnostic Classification Probability using the SCID, CIDI and MINI Diagnostic Interviews among Women in Pregnancy or Postpartum:An Individual Participant Data Meta-analysis

Abstract

Metadata

Download

Published Version

Export

Statistics