El Jassar, O.G., El Jassar, I.N. and Kritsotakis, E. orcid.org/0000-0002-9526-3852 (2019) Assessment of quality of information available over the internet about vegan diet. Nutrition and Food Science, 49 (6). pp. 1142-1152. ISSN 0034-6659
Abstract
Purpose – This paper aims to assess the quality of health information available to patients seeking online advice about the vegan diet.
Design/methodology/approach – A cross-sectional sample of patient-oriented websites was selected by searching for “Vegan diet” in the 3 most popular search engines. The first 50 websites from each search were examined. Quality of information was assessed using the DISCERN instrument, a questionnaire tool designed to judge the quality of written information on treatment choices. Readability was determined with the Flesch Reading Ease score (FRES) and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL). Relevance to health and disease was assessed by counting the appearances of 10 related keywords, generated by searching the query term “Vegan diet” into PubMed and recording the top 10 health-related words.
Findings – Of 150 websites retrieved, 67 (44.7%) met inclusion criteria. Of these, 42 (62.7%) were non-pharmaceutical commercial, 7 (10.4%) institutional, 6 (9.0%) magazines or newspapers, 4 (6.0%) support websites, 4 (6.0%) charitable websites, 2 (3.0%) encyclopedias, and 2 (3.0%) personal blogs. The overall DISCERN rating of the websites was fair (mean 41.6±15.4 on an 80-point scale), but nearly half (31/67) of the websites were assessed as having ‘poor’ or ‘very poor’ quality of information. FRES and FKGL readability indices met the recommended standards on average (means 63.3±9.6 and 6.6±1.7, respectively), but did not correlate with high DISCERN ratings. Analysis of variance on DISCERN scores (F(6,60)=6.536, P<0.001) and FRES (F(6,60)=2.733, p=0.021) yielded significant variation according to website source type.
Originality/value – Quality standards of health information available on the Internet about the Vegan diet vary greatly. Patients are at risk of exposure to low quality and potentially misleading information over the Internet and should be consulting dietitians or physicians to avoid being misled.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © 2019 Emerald Publishing Limited. This is an author-produced version of a paper subsequently published in Nutrition and Food Science. This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial Licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. You may not use the material for commercial purposes. |
Keywords: | Health promotion; Internet; Social media |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of Sheffield |
Academic Units: | The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health (Sheffield) > School of Health and Related Research (Sheffield) > ScHARR - Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Sheffield |
Date Deposited: | 16 May 2019 10:40 |
Last Modified: | 03 Dec 2021 09:32 |
Status: | Published |
Publisher: | Emerald |
Refereed: | Yes |
Identification Number: | 10.1108/NFS-02-2019-0044 |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:146175 |