Hu, Z., Berto, F., Hong, Y. et al. (1 more author) (2019) Comparison of TCD and SED methods in fatigue lifetime assessment. International Journal of Fatigue, 123. pp. 105-134. ISSN 0142-1123
Abstract
This paper assesses the accuracy and reliability of the Theory of Critical Distances (TCD) and the Strain Energy Density (SED) approach in estimating the lifetime of plain and notched specimens subjected to cyclic loading. To validate the two approaches for plain and notched components under uniaxial and multiaxial fatigue loading, a large bulk of experimental data taken from the literature was re-analyzed, with the state variables, i.e. the stress distributions and the strain energy density, being calculated via the Finite Element (FE) method. The results obtained demonstrate that both the TCD and the SED approach can provide highly accurate fatigue life estimation. In addition, these two approaches require little computational effort and little calibration information to be implemented and used for fatigue design in situations of practical interest.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © 2019 Elsevier. This is an author produced version of a paper subsequently published in International Journal of Fatigue. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. Article available under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-ND licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
Keywords: | Theory of Critical Distances; Strain Energy Density; Modified Wöhler Curve; Uniaxial fatigue; Multiaxial fatigue |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of Sheffield |
Academic Units: | The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Engineering (Sheffield) > Department of Civil and Structural Engineering (Sheffield) |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Sheffield |
Date Deposited: | 26 Feb 2019 14:25 |
Last Modified: | 11 Feb 2020 01:38 |
Published Version: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.02.009 |
Status: | Published |
Publisher: | Elsevier |
Refereed: | Yes |
Identification Number: | 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.02.009 |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:142394 |