Foley, JRJ, Broadbent, DA, Fent, GJ et al. (8 more authors) (2019) Clinical evaluation of two dark blood methods of late gadolinium quantification of ischemic scar. Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 50 (1). pp. 146-152. ISSN 1053-1807
Abstract
Background
Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging was validated for diagnosis and quantification of myocardial infarction (MI). Despite good contrast between scar and normal myocardium, contrast between blood pool and myocardial scar can be limited. Dark blood LGE sequences attempt to overcome this issue.
Purpose
To evaluate T1 rho (T1ρ)‐prepared dark blood sequence and compare to blood nulled (BN) phase sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR) and standard myocardium nulled (MN) PSIR for detection and quantification of scar.
Study Type
Prospective.
Population
Thirty patients with prior MI.
Field Strength/Sequence
Patients underwent identical 1.5 T MRI protocols. Following routine LGE imaging, a slice with scar, remote myocardium, and blood pool was selected. PSIR LGE was repeated with inversion time set to MN, to BN, and T1ρ FIDDLE (flow‐independent dark‐blood delayed enhancement) in random order.
Assessment
Three observers. Qualitative assessment of confidence scores in scar detection and degree of transmurality. Quantitative assessment of myocardial scar mass (grams), and contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR) measurements between scar, blood pool, and myocardium.
Statistical Tests
Repeated‐measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni correction, coefficient of variation, and the Cohen κ statistic.
Results
CNRscar‐blood was significantly increased for both BN (27.1 ± 10.4) and T1ρ (30.2 ± 15.1) compared with MN (15.3 ± 8.4 P < 0.001 for both sequences). There was no significant difference in CNRscar‐myo between BN (55.9 ± 17.3) and MN (51.1 ± 17.8 P = 0.512); both had significantly higher CNRscar‐myo compared with the T1ρ (42.6 ± 16.9 P = 0.007 and P = 0.014, respectively). No significant difference in scar size between LGE methods: MN (2.28 ± 1.58 g) BN (2.16 ± 1.57 g) and T1ρ (2.29 ± 2.5 g). Confidence scores were significantly higher for BN (3.87 ± 0.346) compared with MN (3.1 ± 0.76 P < 0.001) and T1ρ (3.20 ± 0.71 P < 0.001).
Data Conclusion
PSIR with inversion time (TI) set for blood nulling and the T1ρ LGE sequence demonstrated significantly higher scar to blood CNR compared with routine MN. PSIR with TI set for blood nulling demonstrated significantly higher reader confidence scores compared with routine MN and T1ρ LGE, suggesting routine adoption of a BN PSIR approach might be appropriate for LGE imaging.
Level of Evidence: 2
Technical Efficacy: Stage 2
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © 2019 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Foley, JRJ, Broadbent, DA, Fent, GJ et al. (8 more authors) (2019) Clinical evaluation of two dark blood methods of late gadolinium quantification of ischemic scar. Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI. ISSN 1053-1807, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.26613. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. |
Keywords: | late gadolinium enhancement; myocardial infarction; ischemic heart disease; bright blood; dark blood |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of Leeds |
Academic Units: | The University of Leeds > Faculty of Medicine and Health (Leeds) > School of Medicine (Leeds) > Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (LICAMM) > Biomedical Imaging Science Dept (Leeds) The University of Leeds > Faculty of Medicine and Health (Leeds) > School of Medicine (Leeds) > Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (LICAMM) > Division of Biomedical Imaging (Leeds) |
Funding Information: | Funder Grant number British Heart Foundation 29062 |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Publications |
Date Deposited: | 08 Jan 2019 14:50 |
Last Modified: | 03 Jan 2020 01:39 |
Status: | Published |
Publisher: | Wiley |
Identification Number: | 10.1002/jmri.26613 |
Related URLs: | |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:140720 |