Crastes, R and Mahieu, P-A (2014) Contingent valuation versus choice experiments: a meta-analysis application exploring the determinants of the time for publication acceptance. Economics Bulletin, 34 (3). pp. 1575-1599. ISSN 1545-2921
Abstract
In this paper, we test whether the time it takes for a submitted paper to be accepted by the editor(s) is sensitive to the stated preference method used. Two methods are considered: the Contingent Valuation (CV) and the Choice Experiments (CE). A meta-analysis based on a sample of 129 papers published in Resource and Energy Economics, Ecological Economics and Environmental and Resource Economics between 2005 and 2011 is conducted. The dependent variable in the ordinary least squares regression model is the number of days between the submission of the paper and the acceptance of the paper, referred to as Time for Publication Acceptance, or TPA. The main results are that TPA is lower for CE papers than CV papers, especially for those that aim at improving the method which can be interpreted as a higher academic demand in the CE field. However, a convergence is observed over the years.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | This article is protected by copyright. Reproduced in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. |
Keywords: | meta-analysis; choice experiment; contingent valuation; time for publication acceptance |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of Leeds |
Academic Units: | The University of Leeds > Faculty of Environment (Leeds) > Institute for Transport Studies (Leeds) |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Publications |
Date Deposited: | 04 Sep 2018 15:58 |
Last Modified: | 25 Jun 2023 21:29 |
Published Version: | http://www.accessecon.com/pubs/eb/default.aspx?top... |
Status: | Published |
Publisher: | Economics Bulletin |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:134997 |