Cook, Kay and Skinner, Christine orcid.org/0000-0001-8548-9009 (2019) Gender equality in child support policy:Fathers’ rhetoric of ‘fairness’ in a parliamentary inquiry. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society. pp. 164-187. ISSN 1072-4745
Abstract
Child support payments extend separated fathers’ male breadwinning role across households, likely fuelling fathers’ perceptions of ‘unfairness’. By examining fathers’ written submissions to an Australian inquiry, we examine fathers’ claims of unfairness, which were expressed in terms of gender inequality. Here, we show how fathers adopted a gender equality discourse that left intact the existing gender order. Through expectations for equal treatment, men claimed the child support system would produce equality of outcomes, namely eliminating the redistributive need for child support payments. In doing so, fathers’ qualified support for gender equality advantaged men as payers while further entrenching gender inequity.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press. This is an author-produced version of the published paper. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self-archiving policy. Further copying may not be permitted; contact the publisher for details. |
Keywords: | child support; feminist policy analysis; gender equality; gender equity; male breadwinner model; separated fathers |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of York |
Academic Units: | The University of York > Faculty of Social Sciences (York) > Social Policy and Social Work (York) |
Depositing User: | Pure (York) |
Date Deposited: | 13 Mar 2018 12:00 |
Last Modified: | 18 Feb 2025 00:08 |
Published Version: | https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxy014 |
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Identification Number: | 10.1093/sp/jxy014 |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:128494 |
Download
Filename: revised_manuscript_including_response_to_reviewers.pdf
Description: revised manuscript including response to reviewers