Jones, SI orcid.org/0000-0003-2940-4431 and Malkani, B (2017) Beastly Humans: The Welfare Model of Executions. Law, Culture and the Humanities. ISSN 1743-8721
Abstract
In determining whether executions are “humane,” authorities in the USA tend to balance the interest of the condemned person to be free from suffering with the interest of observers to be free from distress. This “welfare model” mirrors the approach to terminating the lives of companion non-human animals. We argue, therefore, that lethal injections are unconstitutional not because of the risk of pain that they present, but because, as a matter of principle they relegate human beings to the same moral space as non-human animals. This conflicts with the Eighth Amendment requirement that punishments respect the dignity of the person.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © The Author(s) 2017. This is an author produced version of a paper published in Law, Culture and the Humanities. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. |
Keywords: | Death penalty; dignity; animal rights; welfare; executions; Eighth Amendment |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of Leeds |
Academic Units: | The University of Leeds > Faculty of Education, Social Sciences and Law (Leeds) > School of Law (Leeds) |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Publications |
Date Deposited: | 07 Nov 2017 15:28 |
Last Modified: | 10 Mar 2023 14:34 |
Status: | Published online |
Publisher: | SAGE Publications |
Identification Number: | 10.1177/1743872117739563 |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:123555 |