Doran, R.P. (2017) Restorative Aesthetic Pleasures and the Restoration of Pleasure. Australasian Philosophical Review, 1 (1). pp. 73-78. ISSN 2474-0500
Abstract
I argue, contra Mohan Matthen, that at least some aesthetic pleasures arising from the appreciation of aesthetic features of artworks are what he calls ‘r-pleasures’ as opposed to ‘f-pleasures’—and moreover, that the paradigm aesthetic pleasure (arising in response to beauty) appears to be an r-pleasure on Matthen's terms. I then argue that talk of r- and f-pleasures does not distinguish different kinds, but two different features of pleasure; so this supposed distinction (at least) cannot be used to characterize a sui generis aesthetic pleasure.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Australasian Philosophical Review on 26 Mar 2017, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/24740500.2017.1296399 |
Keywords: | aesthetic experience; beauty; pleasure; disinterestedness |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of Sheffield |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Sheffield |
Date Deposited: | 06 Nov 2017 15:15 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2018 00:38 |
Published Version: | https://doi.org/10.1080/24740500.2017.1296399 |
Status: | Published |
Publisher: | Taylor & Francis |
Refereed: | Yes |
Identification Number: | 10.1080/24740500.2017.1296399 |
Related URLs: | |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:123487 |