Dickson, J.M. orcid.org/0000-0002-1361-2714, Delaney, B. and Connor, M.E. (2017) Primary Care Endometrial Sampling for Abnormal Uterine Bleeding: A Pilot Study. Journal of family planning and reproductive health care, 43 (4). pp. 247-248. ISSN 1471-1893
Abstract
Background
Most cases of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) could potentially be managed in primary care but lack of access to endometrial sampling leads to avoidable referrals to hospital to rule out endometrial hyperplasia and cancer.
Aims
To design and evaluate a pilot service for primary care endometrial sampling (PCES).
Design
Retrospective analysis of data from two service evaluations.
Setting
General practices and the gynaecology department in a large city in the United Kingdom.
Methods
1) To design the new service we identified all the endometrial samples taken in the city’s gynaecology department in 2012/13 and estimated the proportion of these with AUB that would be suitable for PCES. 2) To evaluate the new PCES service we analysed data from the first year of activity.
Results
1) 1894 endometrial samples were taken in hospital in 2012/13. An estimated 424 (22.4%) of these were from patients with AUB who fitted the criteria for PCES. 2) In the first year of the PCES service 108 samples were taken by GPs. Initial management of these patients was exclusively in primary care in 97.2% (104/108), most patients were treated with Mirena IUS (79/109; 73.1%) and there were no cases of hyperplasia or cancer.
Conclusions
Most pre-menopausal patients with AUB could potentially be managed in primary care without referral to hospital if ES was made available to appropriately trained and supported GPs. However, this study was limited by it’s retrospective non-interventional design and more research is required to demonstrate safety and cost-effectiveness.
Key Message Points
Primary care is a crucial part of the care pathway for patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. In the first instance, the majority of patients with AUB can be managed exclusively in primary care without referral to hospital. Primary care management of AUB may be cost effective but an economic model of the care pathway is required to make accurate comparisons between primary care and secondary care.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. This is an author produced version of a paper subsequently published in Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of Sheffield |
Academic Units: | The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health (Sheffield) > The Medical School (Sheffield) |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Sheffield |
Date Deposited: | 13 Jul 2017 14:45 |
Last Modified: | 02 Nov 2017 15:37 |
Published Version: | https://doi.org/10.1136/jfprhc-2017-101910 |
Status: | Published |
Publisher: | BMJ Publishing Group |
Refereed: | Yes |
Identification Number: | 10.1136/jfprhc-2017-101910 |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:119025 |