Cohen, Dale and Quinlan, Philip Thomas orcid.org/0000-0002-8847-6390 (2017) The log-linear response function of the bounded number-line task is unrelated to the psychological representation of quantity. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. ISSN 1069-9384
Abstract
The bounded number-line task has been used extensively to assess the numerical competence of both children and adults. One consistent finding is that young children display a logarithmic response function, whereas older children and adults display a more linear response function. Traditionally, these log-linear functions have been interpreted as providing a transparent window onto the nature of the participants’ psychological representation of quantity (termed here a direct response strategy). Here we show that the direct response strategy produces the log-linear response function regardless of whether the psychological representation of quantity is compressive or expansive. Simply put, the log-linear response function results from task constraints rather than the psychological representation of quantities. We also demonstrate that a proportion/subtraction response strategy produces response patterns that almost perfectly correlate with the psychological representation of quantity. We therefore urge researchers not to interpret the log-linear response pattern in terms of numerical representation.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2017. This is an author-produced version of the published paper. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self-archiving policy. Further copying may not be permitted; contact the publisher for details |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of York |
Academic Units: | The University of York > Faculty of Sciences (York) > Psychology (York) |
Depositing User: | Pure (York) |
Date Deposited: | 11 May 2017 11:20 |
Last Modified: | 21 Jan 2025 17:25 |
Published Version: | https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1290-z |
Status: | Published online |
Refereed: | Yes |
Identification Number: | 10.3758/s13423-017-1290-z |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:116291 |