Faulkner, P. (2014) The moral obligations of trust. Philosophical Explorations, 17 (3). pp. 332-345. ISSN 1386-9795
Abstract
Moral obligation, Darwall argues, is irreducibly second personal. So too, McMyler argues, is the reason for belief supplied by testimony and which supports trust. In this paper, I follow Darwall in arguing that the testimony is not second personal ‘all the way down’. However, I go on to argue, this shows that trust is not fully second personal, which in turn shows that moral obligation is equally not second personal ‘all the way down’.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © 2014 Taylor & Francis (Routledge). This is an author produced version of a paper subsequently published in Philosophical Explorations. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. |
Keywords: | reasons; second person; moral obligation; trust; testimony |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of Sheffield |
Academic Units: | The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Arts and Humanities (Sheffield) > Department of Philosophy (Sheffield) |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Sheffield |
Date Deposited: | 15 Feb 2017 15:44 |
Last Modified: | 22 Mar 2018 01:50 |
Published Version: | https://doi.org/10.1080/13869795.2014.942228 |
Status: | Published |
Publisher: | Taylor & Francis |
Refereed: | Yes |
Identification Number: | 10.1080/13869795.2014.942228 |
Related URLs: | |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:112185 |