Keay, A and Zhao, J (2017) Accountability in Corporate Governance in China and the Impact of Guanxi as a Double-Edged Sword. Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law, 11 (2). pp. 377-415. ISSN 1934-2497
Abstract
Accountability is an essential aspect of corporate governance and it has been argued that the “wenze” system of accountability in China comes very close, in the context of corporate governance, to the accountability systems developed in Anglo-American corporate governance. The paper examines the role of cultural factors, namely guanxi and its derivatives, in corporate governance in China to determine what effect, if any, these cultural factors have on the operation and development of the “wenze” system in large listed companies. The paper specifically considers whether the cultural elements affect accountability, and if so, how and to what extent. It also explores whether these cultural factors are good, bad or neutral as far as the development of accountability in fostering good corporate governance is concerned The paper advocates a realistic, functional and culturally sensitive corporate governance accountability system in China, under which guanxi and its derivatives will not be regarded as a substitute for accountability but will work within the “wenze” system of accountability. Meanwhile, the paper’s analysis demonstrates also that guanxi is a double-edge sword, for while it can be an impediment to accountability it is not totally inimical to ensuring that there is accountability.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © 2017, the Author(s). This is an open access paper, under the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 License (CC BY-NC-ND). |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of Leeds |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Publications |
Date Deposited: | 02 Dec 2016 11:40 |
Last Modified: | 23 Jun 2023 22:18 |
Published Version: | http://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/bjcfcl/vol11/iss... |
Status: | Published |
Publisher: | Brooklyn Law School |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:108817 |