Hutchinson, A., Coster, J.E., Cooper, K.L. et al. (8 more authors) (2010) Comparison of case note review methods for evaluating quality and safety in health care. Health Technology Assessment, 14 (10). pp. 1-170. ISSN 1366-5278
Abstract
Objectives: To determine which of two methods of case note review – holistic (implicit) and criterion-based (explicit) – provides the most useful and reliable information for quality and safety of care, and the level of agreement within and between groups of health-care professionals when they use the two methods to review the same record. To explore the process–outcome relationship between holistic and criterion-based quality-of-care measures and hospital-level outcome indicators. © 2010 Crown Copyright
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © 2010 Queen's Printer and Controller of HMSO. Reproduced in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of Sheffield |
Academic Units: | The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Social Sciences (Sheffield) > Information School (Sheffield) The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health (Sheffield) > School of Health and Related Research (Sheffield) |
Depositing User: | Miss Anthea Tucker |
Date Deposited: | 17 Mar 2010 14:04 |
Last Modified: | 04 Jun 2014 19:37 |
Published Version: | http://www.hta.ac.uk/1575 |
Status: | Published |
Publisher: | National Institute for Health Research |
Refereed: | Yes |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:10704 |