Porter, I, Gonçalves-Bradley, D, Ricci-Cabello, I et al. (6 more authors) (2016) Framework and guidance for implementing patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: evidence, challenges and opportunities. Journal of comparative effectiveness research, 5 (5). pp. 507-519. ISSN 2042-6305
Abstract
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are reports of the status of a patient's health condition that come directly from the patient. While PRO measures are a well-developed technology with robust standards in research, their use for informing healthcare decisions is still poorly understood. We review relevant examples of their application in the provision of healthcare and examine the challenges associated with implementing PROs in clinical settings. We evaluate evidence for their use and examine barriers to their uptake, and present an evidence-based framework for the successful implementation of PROs in clinical practice. We discuss current and future developments for the use of PROs in clinical practice, such as individualized measurement and computer-adaptive testing.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © 2016, Future Medicine. This is an author produced version of a paper published in Journal of comparative effectiveness research. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of Leeds |
Academic Units: | The University of Leeds > Faculty of Education, Social Sciences and Law (Leeds) > School of Sociology and Social Policy (Leeds) |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Publications |
Date Deposited: | 26 Jul 2016 12:26 |
Last Modified: | 01 Aug 2017 21:03 |
Published Version: | http://dx.doi.org/10.2217/cer-2015-0014 |
Status: | Published |
Publisher: | Future Medicine |
Identification Number: | 10.2217/cer-2015-0014 |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:102917 |