Ainsworth, Sean B and McGuire, William orcid.org/0000-0001-8572-3467 (2016) Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters vs Peripheral Cannulas for Delivering Parenteral Nutrition in Neonates. JAMA. pp. 2612-2613. ISSN 1538-3598
Abstract
CLINICAL QUESTION: Is parenteral nutrition via peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) associated with better delivery of nutrition and growth and fewer adverse events compared with short peripheral cannulas in neonates? BOTTOM LINE: Compared with short peripheral cannulas, parenteral nutrition via PICCs is associated with better nutrient delivery and lower rates of subsequent catheters or cannulas placed and is not associated with increased rates of invasive infection.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | Copyright 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self-archiving policy. Further copying may not be permitted; contact the publisher for details |
Keywords: | Catheterization, Central Venous,Catheterization, Peripheral,Humans,Infant, Newborn,Parenteral Nutrition |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of York |
Academic Units: | The University of York > Faculty of Sciences (York) > Hull York Medical School (York) |
Depositing User: | Pure (York) |
Date Deposited: | 15 Jul 2016 14:15 |
Last Modified: | 19 Mar 2025 00:07 |
Published Version: | https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.7020 |
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Identification Number: | 10.1001/jama.2016.7020 |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:102535 |