A case study of binary outcome data extraction across three systematic reviews of hip arthroplasty: errors and differences of selection.

Carroll, C., Scope, A. and Kaltenthaler, E. (2013) A case study of binary outcome data extraction across three systematic reviews of hip arthroplasty: errors and differences of selection. BMC Research Notes, 6. 539. ISSN 1756-0500

Abstract

Metadata

Authors/Creators:
  • Carroll, C.
  • Scope, A.
  • Kaltenthaler, E.
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: © 2013 Carroll et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Keywords: Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Data Collection; Humans; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Publication Bias; Research Design
Dates:
  • Published: 17 December 2013
  • Accepted: 15 November 2013
Institution: The University of Sheffield
Academic Units: The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health (Sheffield) > School of Health and Related Research (Sheffield) > Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research
Depositing User: Symplectic Sheffield
Date Deposited: 04 Feb 2016 13:12
Last Modified: 04 Feb 2016 13:12
Published Version: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-6-539
Status: Published
Publisher: BioMed Central
Refereed: Yes
Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-6-539
Related URLs:

Share / Export

Statistics