Finn, O and Brockway, PE orcid.org/0000-0001-6925-8040 (2023) Much broader than health: Surveying the diverse co-benefits of energy demand reduction in Europe. Energy Research and Social Science, 95. 102890. p. 102890. ISSN 2214-6296
Abstract
Demand-side energy reduction measures that aim to reduce energy usage are an effective tool in reducing greenhouse gas emissions as part of a net zero emissions push in Europe. However, often barriers within policymaking hinder deployment. Co-benefits - the secondary benefits of climate change mitigation action - offer an opportunity to reframe energy reduction as financially advantageous and also address a wide range of other policy goals. In support, we survey the type, frequency, and scale of energy demand reduction (EDR) co-benefits in Europe, and assess how these co-benefits can be accounted for in future EDR policymaking.
We conduct a review of co-benefits associated with EDR literature. From 53 selected papers, 86 unique co-benefits are identified across five different categories: Health, Energy Security, Economy, Social, and Environment. Economic co-benefits represent the highest proportion. Health/environmental impacts of air quality are the most cited individual co-benefit. While quantification methodology is discussed frequently, only a fifth of the papers attempt primary quantification of energy reduction co-benefits, with most of those concerned only with air quality. Lastly, a matrix framework is developed that conveys quantifiability and required timescales for key individual co-benefits.
We propose a four-step plan for improving the use of co-benefits, deepening the evidence base to improve climate change mitigation policy: (1) Work on standardisation of co-benefit terms to aid understanding and quantification, (2) Greater focus on cross-disciplinary co-benefit research to avoid research siloes, (3) Greater research on primary quantification of EDR co-benefits to establish functional methodologies and raise awareness of policymakers, and (4) Given high barriers to entry on co-benefits, greater efforts are needed to take co-benefits to policy-makers.
Metadata
Authors/Creators: |
|
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). | ||||||
Keywords: | Energy efficiency; Co-benefits; Energy demand reduction; Multiple benefits; Non-energy benefits; Ancillary benefits | ||||||
Dates: |
|
||||||
Institution: | The University of Leeds | ||||||
Academic Units: | The University of Leeds > Faculty of Environment (Leeds) > School of Earth and Environment (Leeds) > Sustainability Research Institute (SRI) (Leeds) | ||||||
Funding Information: |
|
||||||
Depositing User: | Symplectic Publications | ||||||
Date Deposited: | 21 Dec 2022 15:37 | ||||||
Last Modified: | 21 Dec 2022 15:37 | ||||||
Published Version: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102890 | ||||||
Status: | Published | ||||||
Publisher: | Elsevier | ||||||
Identification Number: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102890 |
Download
Filename: Finn and Brockway 2022 co-benefits survey paper.pdf
Licence: CC-BY 4.0