Comparison between direct and reverse electroporation of cells in situ: a simulation study.

Towhidi, L., Khodadadi, D., Maimari, N. et al. (7 more authors) (2016) Comparison between direct and reverse electroporation of cells in situ: a simulation study. Physiological Reports, 4 (6). e12673. ISSN 2051-817X

Abstract

Metadata

Authors/Creators:
  • Towhidi, L.
  • Khodadadi, D.
  • Maimari, N.
  • Pedrigi, R.M.
  • Ip, H.
  • Kis, Z.
  • Kwak, B.R.
  • Petrova, T.W.
  • Delorenzi, M.
  • Krams, R.
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: © 2016 The Authors. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American Physiological Society and The Physiological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Keywords: Electroporation; high‐throughput techniques; transfection efficiency; Animals; Biological Transport; Cell Membrane; Cell Membrane Permeability; Cells, Cultured; Computer Simulation; Diffusion; Electroporation; Endothelial Cells; Humans; Models, Genetic; Numerical Analysis, Computer-Assisted; Porosity; RNA Interference; RNA, Small Interfering; Software; Transfection
Dates:
  • Accepted: 10 December 2015
  • Published (online): 23 March 2016
  • Published: March 2016
Institution: The University of Sheffield
Academic Units: The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Engineering (Sheffield) > Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering (Sheffield)
Depositing User: Symplectic Sheffield
Date Deposited: 05 Oct 2021 15:11
Last Modified: 05 Oct 2021 15:11
Status: Published
Publisher: Wiley
Refereed: Yes
Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.12673
Related URLs:

Download

Share / Export

Statistics