A review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of routine anti-D prophylaxis for pregnant women who are rhesus-negative

Chilcott, J., Lloyd Jones, M., Wight, J. et al. (4 more authors) (2003) A review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of routine anti-D prophylaxis for pregnant women who are rhesus-negative. Technical Report. Core Research , Alton.

Abstract

Metadata

Authors/Creators:
  • Chilcott, J.
  • Lloyd Jones, M.
  • Wight, J.
  • Forman, K.
  • Wray, J.
  • Beverley, C.
  • Tappenden, P.
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: Copyright: Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2002 HTA reports may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and may be included in professional journals provided that suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising. Violations should be reported to hta@soton.ac.uk Applications for commercial reproduction should be addressed to HMSO, The Copyright Unit, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich, NR3 1BQ
Keywords: Clinical effectiveness, Cost effectiveness, Anti-D prophylaxis, Pregnancy, Pregnant, Women, Rhesus-negative, RHO(D)- Immunoglobulin
Dates:
  • Published: February 2003
Institution: The University of Sheffield
Academic Units: The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health (Sheffield) > School of Health and Related Research (Sheffield)
Depositing User: Diana Papaioannou
Date Deposited: 01 Dec 2006
Last Modified: 30 Jul 2015 12:11
Published Version: http://www.hta.ac.uk/1244
Status: Published
Publisher: Core Research
Identification Number: ISSN 1366-5278

Download not available

A full text copy of this item is not currently available from White Rose Research Online

Export

Statistics