Entropy-based termination criterion for multiobjective evolutionary algorithms

Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms evolve a population of solutions through successive generations toward the Pareto-optimal front (POF). One of the most critical questions faced by the researchers and practitioners in this domain relates to the number of generations that may be sufficient for an algorithm to offer a good approximation of the POF for a given problem. Ironically, to date, this question largely remains unanswered and the number of generations are arbitrarily fixed a priori, with potentially punitive implications. If the a priori fixed generations are insufficient, then the algorithm reports suboptimal solutions. In contrast, if the a priori fixed generations are far too many, it implies waste of computational resources. This paper proposes a novel entropy-based dissimilarity measure that helps identify on the fly the number of generations beyond which an algorithm stabilizes, implying that either a good approximation has been obtained or that it cannot be obtained due to the stagnation of the algorithm in the search space. Given that in either case no further improvement in the approximation can be obtained, despite additional computational expense, the proposed dissimilarity measure provides a termination criterion and facilitates a termination detection algorithm. The generality, on-the-fly implementation, low-computational complexity, and the demonstrated efficacy of the proposed termination detection algorithm, on a wide range of multiobjective and many-objective test problems, define the novel contribution of this paper.