Operator-dependent variability of angiography-derived fractional flow reserve and the implications for treatment

Aims

To extend the benefits of physiologically-guided percutaneous coronary intervention to many patients, angiography-derived or ‘virtual’ fractional flow reserve (vFFR) has been developed, in which FFR is computed, based upon the images, instead of being measured invasively. The effect of operator experience with these methods upon vFFR accuracy remains unknown. We investigated variability in vFFR results based upon operator experience with image-based computational modelling techniques.

Methods

vFFR was computed using a proprietary method (VIRTUheart) from the invasive angiograms of patients with coronary artery disease. Each case was processed by an expert (>100 vFFR cases) and a non-expert (<20 vFFR cases) operator and results were compared. The primary outcome was the variability in vFFR between experts and non-experts and the impact this had upon treatment strategy (PCI vs conservative management).

Results

231 vessels (199 patients) were processed. Mean non-expert and expert vFFRs were similar overall (0.76 (0.13) and 0.77 (0.16)) but there was significant variability between individual results (variability coefficient 12%, intra-class correlation coefficient 0.58), with only moderate agreement (κ = 0.46), and this led to a statistically significant change in management strategy in 27% of cases. Variability was significantly lower, and agreement higher, for expert operators; a change in their recommended management occurred in 10% of repeated expert measurements and 14% of inter-expert measurements.

Conclusions

vFFR results are influenced by operator experience of vFFR processing. This had implications for treatment allocation. These results highlight the importance of training and quality assurance to ensure reliable, repeatable vFFR results.