The dilemmas of constitutional courts and the case for a new design of Kelsenian institutions

Castillo Ortiz, P. orcid.org/0000-0003-4540-1855 (2020) The dilemmas of constitutional courts and the case for a new design of Kelsenian institutions. Law and Philosophy, 39. pp. 617-655. ISSN 0167-5249

Abstract

Metadata

Authors/Creators:
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: © The Author(s) 2020. Open Access: This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Keywords: Constitutional Review; Institutional Design; Constitutional Courts; Kelsen; Neo-Constitutionalism; Political Constitutionalism
Dates:
  • Accepted: 19 February 2020
  • Published (online): 13 March 2020
  • Published: December 2020
Institution: The University of Sheffield
Academic Units: The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Social Sciences (Sheffield) > Department of Law (Sheffield)
Depositing User: Symplectic Sheffield
Date Deposited: 19 Feb 2020 12:43
Last Modified: 29 Jun 2021 09:40
Status: Published
Publisher: Springer
Refereed: Yes
Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-020-09378-3

Share / Export

Statistics