Which method is best for the induction of labour?: A systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis

Alfirevic, Zarko, Keeney, Edna, Dowswell, Therese et al. (6 more authors) (2016) Which method is best for the induction of labour?: A systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis. Health technology assessment. pp. 1-583. ISSN 2046-4924

Abstract

Metadata

Authors/Creators:
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: © Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2016.
Keywords: labour induction, systematic review, network meta-analysis, cost-effectiveness analysis, comparative effectiveness research,Drug Administration Routes,Misoprostol/economics,Humans,United Kingdom,Amniotomy/education,Oxytocin/economics,Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic,Dose-Response Relationship, Drug,Pregnancy,Cost-Benefit Analysis,Female,Decision Trees,Network Meta-Analysis,Labor, Induced/economics,Health Policy
Dates:
  • Published: 30 August 2016
Institution: The University of York
Academic Units: The University of York > Faculty of Social Sciences (York) > Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (York)
Depositing User: Pure (York)
Date Deposited: 02 Oct 2018 13:40
Last Modified: 01 Jul 2022 23:28
Published Version: https://doi.org/10.3310/hta20650
Status: Published
Refereed: Yes
Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.3310/hta20650
Related URLs:

Download

Filename: Which_method_is_best_for_the_induction_of_labour.pdf

Description: Which method is best for the induction of labour

Share / Export

Statistics