Background: To assess the feasibility and potential impact on target delineation of respiratory-gated (4D) contrast-enhanced 18 Fluorine fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography - computed tomography (PET-CT), in the treatment planning position, for a prospective cohort of patients with lower third oesophageal cancer. Methods: Fifteen patients were recruited into the study. Imaging included 4D PET-CT, 3D PET-CT, endoscopic ultrasound and planning 4D CT. Target volume delineation was performed on 4D CT, 4D CT with co-registered 3D PET and 4D PET-CT. Planning target volumes (PTV) generated with 4D CT (PTV 4DCT), 4D CT co-registered with 3D PET-CT (PTV 3DPET4DCT) and 4D PET-CT (PTV 4DPETCT ) were compared with multiple positional metrics. Results: Mean PTV 4DCT , PTV 3DPET4DCT and PTV 4DPETCT were 582.4 ± 275.1 cm 3 , 472.5 ± 193.1 cm 3 and 480.6 ± 236.9 cm 3 respectively (no significant difference). Median DICE similarity coefficients comparing PTV 4DCT with PTV 3DPET4DCT, PTV 4DCT with PTV 4DPETCT and PTV 3DPET4DCT with PTV 4DPETCT were 0.85 (range 0.65-0.9), 0.85 (range 0.69-0.9) and 0.88 (range 0.79-0.9) respectively. The median sensitivity index for overlap comparing PTV 4DCT with PTV 3DPET4DCT, PTV 4DCT with PTV 4DPETCT and PTV 3DPET4DCT with PTV 4DPETCT were 0.78 (range 0.65-0.9), 0.79 (range 0.65-0.9) and 0.89 (range 0.68-0.94) respectively. Conclusions: Planning 4D PET-CT is feasible with careful patient selection. PTV generated using 4D CT, 3D PET-CT and 4D PET-CT were of similar volume, however, overlap analysis demonstrated that approximately 20% of PTV 3DPETCT and PTV 4DPETCT are not included in PTV 4DCT , leading to under-coverage of target volume and a potential geometric miss. Additionally, differences between PTV 3DPET4DCT and PTV 4DPETCT suggest a potential benefit for 4D PET-CT. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier - NCT02285660(Registered 21/10/2014).
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)