Background: The objectives of this study were to [1] evaluate the methodological quality of included studies, [2] determine the performance of screening tools for identifying neuropathic pain in patients with cancer. Methods: Systematic literature search identified studies reporting use of LANSS, DN4 or painDETECT in cancer patients with a clinical diagnosis of neuropathic or not neuropathic pain. Individual patient data was requested to examine descriptor item profiles. Results: Six studies recruited a total of 2301 cancer patients of which 1564 (68%) reported pain. Overall accuracy of screening tools ranged from 73%-94%. There was variation in description and rigor of clinical assessment, particularly related to the rigour of clinical judgement of pain as the “referent standard”. Individual data from 1351 patients showed large variation in the selection of neuropathic pain descriptor items by cancer patients with neuropathic pain. LANSS and DN4 items characterised a significantly different neuropathic pain symptom profile from non-neuropathic pain in both tumour- and treatment-related cancer pain aetiologies. Conclusion: We identified concordance between the clinician diagnosis and screening tool outcomes for LANSS, DN4 and PDQ in patients with cancer pain. Shortcomings in relation to standardised clinician assessment are likely to account for variation in screening tool sensitivity, which should include the use of the neuropathic pain grading system. Further research is needed to standardise and improve clinical assessment in patients with cancer pain. Until the standardisation of clinical diagnosis for neuropathic cancer pain has been validated, screening tools offer practical approach to identify potential cases of neuropathic cancer pain.
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)