The high stiffness of bone cements used in vertebroplasty has been hypothesized to contribute to the propensity of adjacent vertebral fractures after treatment. Therefore, new low-modulus cements have been developed; however, there are currently no studies assessing the biomechanical aspects of vertebroplasty with these cements in an ex vivo non-prophylactic model. In this study, we induced wedge fractures through eccentric uniaxial compression to single whole-vertebrae, before and after augmentation with either standard or low modulus cement. Compressive strength and stiffness of individual vertebrae were measured, on 19 samples from metastatic spines and 20 samples from elderly, osteopenic spines. While both cement types increased the strength of both the metastatic (+34% and +63% for standard and low-modulus cement, respectively) and the elderly vertebrae (+ 303% and +113%, respectively), none of them restored the initial stiffness of metastatic specimens (-51% and -46%, respectively). Furthermore, low-modulus cement gave a lower total stiffness (-13%) of elderly specimens whereas standard cement increased it above initial levels (+17%). Results show that vertebroplasty with low-modulus cement could provide restoration of the initial stiffness while increasing the strength of fractured elderly vertebrae and hence represent a treatment modality which is closer to pre augmented behaviour. Also, this study indicates that stiffness-modified cement needs to be optimized for patient/pathology specific treatment.
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)