Stoneham, T (2003) On equivocation. Philosophy. pp. 515-519. ISSN 0031-8191
Full text available as:![[img]](http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/style/images/fileicons/text.png)
|
Text (S0031819103000469a.pdf)
S0031819103000469a.pdf Download (39Kb) |
Published Version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0031819103000469
Abstract
I offer an analysis of equivocation which shows it not to be a fallacy. One who equivocates does not make a logical error but an epistemological one.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. |
| Keywords: | Equivocation Fallacy Logic |
| Academic Units: | The University of York > Philosophy (York) |
| Depositing User: | Tom Stoneham |
| Date Deposited: | 25 Jun 2007 |
| Last Modified: | 19 Feb 2013 11:57 |
| Published Version: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0031819103000469 |
| Status: | Published |
| Refereed: | Yes |
| Related URLs: | |
| URI: | http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/2529 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
